Multi-model deliberation

Two models answer.
A third one decides.

Stop guessing which assistant got it right. DyadCouncil sends your request to two frontier models at once, shows both answers in full, then makes an independent judge model score them and defend a winner.

No account needed yet — sign-in and saved history land in a later release.

Abstract digital data streams and neural pathways

Answer A

GPT-5.6 Terra

OpenAI

Answer B

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Google

Verdict

Judged by GPT-5.6 Sol · GPT-5.5 · Gemini 3.1 Pro

Winner, confidence and a four-criteria scorecard.

How it works

01 / Ask

Send one request

Type the problem once. No prompt tuning per model, no copy-pasting between tabs.

02 / Compare

Two models answer live

Two different model families break the request down and stream their answers in parallel columns.

03 / Judge

You choose the referee

Pick a judge model. It scores both answers on four criteria and commits to a winner with a confidence level.

2 model families

Answers come from genuinely different architectures, not two settings of one model.

4 scored criteria

Accuracy, completeness, clarity and actionability — the same scorecard every time.

Full transparency

Both answers stay on screen next to the verdict, including reasoning traces where available.

Put your next hard question to the council

Strategy decisions, architecture calls, risky drafts — the questions where a second and third opinion actually change the outcome.

Open the workspace